Understand why a deal, bid, or initiative succeeded or failed.
What was the outcome?
Choose the result that best describes what happened.
From your team's perspective, what was the single biggest factor in the outcome?
The root cause — not just a contributing factor.
How strong was the team's execution in your area of responsibility?
1 = significant execution failures, 5 = executed flawlessly.
Where did the team fall short from your perspective?
Be specific — vague feedback doesn't improve future performance.
What did the team do well that should be repeated?
Specific practices or decisions worth carrying forward.
What would you do differently next time?
Concrete changes — not attitude shifts.
Were there external factors that significantly influenced the outcome?
Market conditions, timing, competitor moves — things outside the team's control.
After each completed session, Mayetik generates a structured AI summary. Here's an example of the output format — the actual content reflects each respondent's answers.
The respondent's answers highlighted three recurring themes — each supported by specific examples drawn from their experience. The summary captures what was said, not what was expected.
Two responses stood out as unusually detailed and pointed to an area worth following up on. The full text of each answer is preserved below the summary.
Based on the patterns in this session, the AI identified three concrete actions for the project team to consider. These are drawn directly from the respondent's own suggestions.
Generated from 7 questions · ~12 min session