Validate whether a proposed solution addresses a real, felt problem worth solving.
How significant is this problem in your day-to-day work?
1 = barely noticeable, 5 = a major source of friction or loss.
How often do you encounter this problem?
What is the current cost or impact of not having a solution?
Think in terms of time lost, revenue at risk, quality compromised, or team frustration.
Have you tried to solve this problem before?
→ If answer is "Yes" → skip to Q5
→ If answer is "No" → skip to Q6
What did you try, and what happened?
Describe the approach, the result, and why it was not the answer.
When we described our proposed solution, what resonated most with you?
Referring to the solution we walked you through — what part felt most directly relevant to your situation?
What concerns or objections do you have about our approach?
What gives you pause? What would need to be true for you to feel confident?
If this solution existed today and was ready to use, would you adopt it — and why?
Be honest. Even a 'not yet' or 'probably not' is useful feedback.
After each completed session, Mayetik generates a structured AI summary. Here's an example of the output format — the actual content reflects each respondent's answers.
The respondent's answers highlighted three recurring themes — each supported by specific examples drawn from their experience. The summary captures what was said, not what was expected.
Two responses stood out as unusually detailed and pointed to an area worth following up on. The full text of each answer is preserved below the summary.
Based on the patterns in this session, the AI identified three concrete actions for the project team to consider. These are drawn directly from the respondent's own suggestions.
Generated from 8 questions · ~15 min session